This blog is no longer active, but I continue to post at the group blog MAGHREB POLITICS REVIEW.

Feb 3, 2008

Get thee to a nunnery, farewell

Yet another shift in Libyan strategy could be at hand. According to the BBC, the Brother Leader is fed up with Africa playing hard to get:

Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi has threatened to turn his back on Africa if the continent's leaders again reject his proposals for closer unity.
(Full and marvellous speech here.) This comes on the heels of a series of Qadhafi declarations, last year, that Libya has "turned its back on the Arabs". That's how estranged this old stalwart of Arab nationalism has become from his fellow Arab nations, after they time and again failed to lend proper support to his grand anticolonial schemes, and his multitude of union projects crashed and burned one after the other: with Syria and Egypt in 1971; only Egypt in 1972; Tunisia in 1972 and 1974; Syria in 1980; Morocco in 1984; and all the whole Maghreb region in 1989. He finally parted company with pan-Arabism, or at least active promotion of it, in the late 1980s, after deciding that it was time to mend fences with the West, and realizing to his distress that he was the only Arab leader left to take the idea seriously. That was when he turned his attention to Africa, hoping for a warmer reception there.
[picture: eli eli lama sabachtani]
The ideas stayed much the same, even if the playing field changed: if Arab unity hadn't worked, African unity would. So he pushed for the 2002 transformation of the Organization of African Unity (OAU) into the more close-knit African Union (AU), liberally sprinkling cash across the continent to bring politicians over to his side. Since a couple of years, he has been asking for immediate transformation of the AU into the United States of Africa. Not only could this entity strike a lethal blow to imperialism by adopting the abbreviation "USA", it should also have a joint continental government including ministers of defense and foreign affairs, and all the other important posts. Presumably there would even be room for a pan-African head of state -- but who? Certainly it should be someone dedicated to African unity, a bold political pioneer, a towering figure of African leadership; perhaps someone equipped with funny hats, a slurry accent and a penchant for bombing airliners.

Unfortunately, few African nations have lent more than verbal support to this idea, and even that has tended to be of the muttering and smirking kind; one AU summit after the other has dodged his proposals. The dear Colonel is clearly stung by the rejection, and has now issued a powerful "or else" -- he says that the Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya is considering to pull out of the continent's politics altogether, if Africans won't come together as of right now. That's right, Africa: shape up or you'll see no more support for armed rebel movements, no more meddling in others' internal affairs, no more hallucinatory rambles during AU summits, and no more random alienating of important allies.

Should this threat somehow fail to have the intended effect on his fellow African statesmen, Qadhafi already knows where to set his sights next. The official Jamahiriyya News Agency, JANA, has quoted him explaining his options:
- If we invest 5 billion or 10 billion in the Mediterranean Sea, we will be the most influential country in the Mediterranean Sea, the Arab [world] or in Europe.
So regional domination is still the plan, it seems, even if he might need to revise his cost analysis. The question is merely what region to dominate. Unmentioned, but certainly among the more likely alternatives, is the one area that our darling Colonel hasn't seriously tried to federate yet -- the Maghreb, with a dormant union project already in place, and with supporting plans for Mediterranean integration being pushed hard by his friends in Europe.

Beware, North Africans, and take his word for it: there is no obstacle and no African or Arab negativism that cannot be overcome by Muammar al-Qadhafi's unstoppable optimism, billions and billions in oil money, and perhaps the odd explosive charge. As a recipe for Libyan great power status, it's bound to succeed eventually -- and you bet he's going to keep trying.
[thanks justin]

4 comments:

Justin (koavf) said...

And in 2006, he also chided the West for not rewarding him fast enough after getting rid of his weapons program. Oh, Muamar, what will we do when you die?

Actually, what will happen to Libya once he dies?

-JAK

alle said...

It's been semi-official for years that his eldest son Seif el-Islam will take over, but according to this (notoriously unreliable) website, he's changing the order of succession now.

Might be just as well, if true, because in interviews I've seen with Seif el-Islam, he came off as slightly retarded. Not boogaboo crazy like dad, but not... very bright either.

On Libya, btw, this mess is to be watched. It seems very much related to the increasing chorus of voices that are now trying to flip responsibility for Lockerbie over to Iran instead, through the PFLP-GC. Extremely fishy affair, that.

Justin (koavf) said...

I knew that he was being groomed, but I also knew that he was a maverick and slightly crazy, yes. (Must be genetic...) Does the Green Book say anything about succession? I mean, I don't even know what amounts to constitutional law over there.

Lockerbie again/still? Really? Ugh.

-JAK

alle said...

The Green Book speaks mostly about leaderless direct democracy -- Qadhafi is not even president according to the law -- so according to ideology the people decides. On the other hand, the people always seems to decide in favor of whatever Qadhafi happens to think for the moment.